Julio Marzán | J. A. Marzán

On the NYTimes’ Podcast “Bad Bunny’s Halftime Show: Our Instant Reactions,” Joe Caramanica and Joe Coscarelli, knowledgeable about Puerto Rico and reggaeton, substantively discussed the show’s symbolism. My revisiting the show so soon, however, was not a good idea. Like the record number of viewers, I tuned in to see Bad Bunny counter right-wing hysteria, a mission accomplished spectacularly. Pleased, I didn’t want to have to react to problematic cultural issues the podcasters surely didn’t know they were raising. My problem began when they simply reminded of the show’s opening, jíbaros wearing iconic pavas and cutting sugar cane, interpreted as Bad Bunny’s expression of pride in “Puerto Rico’s history.”

The scene projected the white criollo cultural history descended from the romanticized jíbaro, the foundational narrative I’d heard all my life even though actual history was more complicated. Poverty did push jíbaros to cut cane, especially after slavery. Interior hilltop jíbaros are chiefly remembered as dirt-poor farmers. Coastal black boricuas also historically cut the cane. But criollo island identity provides a mechanism of glossing over such bumpy cultural nodes, acknowledging by adoption without elaboration. On the island, African-rooted song and dance performed by a white ensemble tacitly become criollo cultural tradition. This smoothing out overrides that Puerto Rican music amounts to a history of working to keep the culture racially honest, a lesson that criollo culture both accepts but also curates as colorful folklore. To illustrate, even though the show’s foundation was reggaeton, its racial lesson was drowned out by the showcased criollo cultural purview.

This racial ambiguity is also an undercurrent of the miscommunication between the island and the mainland community, demonstrated in the show’s selective acknowledgment of the post-WWII diaspora (“West Side Story”) as a cultural outer province. “Nuevayol” was represented by Toñita’s Social Club in Brooklyn, an institution of the post-WWII migration’s first generation, which originally planted island criollo culture in the city. That Nuevayol fades, replaced by a fissure that began with post-second generations, partly from classism, partly from mainland-island rivalry, partly from the loss of Spanish, but also–Do you really want to go there?–over the Caribbean bugaboo, race. English most publicly demarcates the island from that younger Nuevayol, but as sharply does the mainland’s explicitness about race. Where the island’s racial consciousness is more blended latino, also affected by socio-economic status, the mainland overcorrects with Anglo genetic racial binaries.

That consciousness may appear to have been sown by the Civil Rights Movement, which actually triggered the community’s inherited island racial ambivalence since its origins in the second half of the nineteenth century. It started with a trickle, increasing with the 1917 extension of U.S. citizenship, a predominantly white, urban and skilled migration. In a photo exhibit in the Museum of the City of New York, only white Boricuas traveled in first class on steamers bound for the city. They settled in East Harlem’s then-called Barrio Latino with also other Hispanics and Italians along Pleasant Street. Islanders being notorious circumventors of unpleasantness, they discouraged discussing race as a rude subject, kept it a hushed affair. Frustrated, the originally nationalist migrant, the afroborinqueño Arturo Schomburg, moved to West Harlem, recommitting his life to “Negro” research.

After WWII, as part of an industrialization initiative, Puerto Rico sought to displace its poverty and proposed to New York City replacing socially-mobile Jewish garment workers with a new workforce. Having already in place civic structures serving a Puerto Rican community, the city agreed. But, only familiar with the chiefly white, skilled migration that had melted into the Spanish community, which had more recently grown with exiles from the Spanish Civil War, the city was hoodwinked. Those who came by the thousands were not predominantly white, urban, or skilled. Not just poverty was being unloaded. The remnants of the older migration fled from the Barrio as the postwar migrants, labeled with the flipside pejorative usage of jíbaro, moved in.

If the urban prewar migration restored Puerto Rican culture’s Iberian Hispanic roots, the new nativist migration kept loyal to island Hispanic criollo culture. Both class responses bulwarked against Americanization although the latter signaled Puerto Rico’s participating in emergent Latin America’s impending breakup of monolithic Spanish. Hence Bad Bunny’s final “God Bless America” was a roll call of the Americas. And because much of the first migration’s leadership remained in place, that new first generation also grandfathered the community’s earlier wholly white image despite the postwar diaspora’s more racially mixed first generation, which weathered that distortion in the island tradition, in silence.

To their children’s exasperation. Having grown up in the Civil Rights Era and as New Yorkers, the second generation spoke out annoyingly on race while claiming their Puerto Rican identity. But when the Young Lords Party, whose leadership was Afro-Boricua and inspired by The Black Panthers, attempted to join the nationalist movement on the island, they hit a class and racial wall. This rejection traumatized a mainland generation that, in the tradition of race being a hushed affair (don’t look for texts or testimonials), voted with their feet and, in New York’s Lower East Side, created Loisada, identifying as the American brown Nuyorican, what the sympathetic media broadcast as defining mainland identity.

This mainland wholesale racializing of “Puerto Rican” as a brown American identity, coupled with the second-generation’s loss of Spanish–Spanish being the linchpin to securing Puerto Rico’s identity–not to mention the loss of island subtlety replaced by explicit, in-your-face New York, widened the breach with islanders, many of whom disown mainland claims to Puerto Ricanness. And yet this rejection is not homogenous in any one sector: the pro-statehood and nationalist divide does not coincide with liberal and conservative attitudes toward the mainland.

The matter is not all about island rejection. On the the one hand, an anticolonial cultural intransigence is understandable; but, on the other hand, the youth-spun Loisaida myth of a street-dude Nuyorican as symbolic of the entire mainland community (from Boston to New York to Chicago to Orlando to Hawaii?) was overblown, its evocations not applicable to the proportion of a mobile generation that would produce Sonia Sotomayor, Raúl Julia, Esmeralda Santiago, Rosy Perez, and later Lin Manuel Miranda, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Martín Espada, among many more. Meanwhile, notwithstanding island patriotic purism, the mainland’s racial challenge is as Puerto Rican as the coquí although more rigorous cultural criticism still awaits, buried on the docket of island-centric mainland academe. With the same, simply out-of-mind, reflexive conventional mindset, Bad Bunny, dramatized the official script of textbook foundational consciousness, which addresses both Afro-Puerto Rico and post-sixties Nuevayol as afterthoughts.

From the mainland’s perspective, the loss of Spanish, class and racial bias motivate the island’s denial of what it wrought in the diaspora: its least prestigious demographic was induced to leave class and racial compartments that had kept them invisible to become a rhetorical race glaringly visible in a New York-sized mirror, representing the whole of “Puerto Rican–the reality to which island music consistently testifies. One may speak predominantly English and the other Spanish, contrasting in the bias of their respective, lop-sided bilingualism. English-speaking islanders bring their college degrees to the mainland while New York competes with San Juan in producing world-class música latina. Nuevayol was the birthplace of salsa, now appropriated as also island music without absorbing its source.

In other words, the mainland reminds us that its rediscovering African cultural and musical roots in struggling beside African Americans really had its origins in the island’s racially mixed working class, which today on its own has adopted its version of hip-hop and writes it in Spanish as well as in English, sometimes appropriating the issues of Newyorican artists. Unfortunately, those mutual mirror images are now conventionally painted over, each side seeing an incompatible, respective loyalty to “being Puerto Rican.” Miami and Havana, East and West Germany.

Bad Bunny’s isla is criolla Puerto Rico, so at halftime, in an unconscious, no-offense-intended manner, that post-second generation Nuevayol was simply ghosted. Major Latino artists were invited to Bad Bunny’s casita, none mainland Rican. Young Mika, born and raised and educated in Puerto Rico, who rose as a rapper in English was invited; Marc Anthony, a Newyorican who became a superstar in Spanish, could have been. His appendage to his fabulous update of the classic “Preciosa,” which especially annoys traditionalists, is used in the government’s current local tourism promotion video.

The same blurred lens through which the island sees the mainland stands between Bad Bunny and his music. Criollo’s default is white while the default of trap and reggaeton is black. In other words, if Bad Bunny descends from the foundational narrative celebrated in his show, his music certainly does not. In fact, Bad Bunny’s show celebrated his fusing his personal criollo identity with his trap/reggaeton persona in his Album of the Year, Debí tirar más fotos. A testament to the internecine gap is the playlist of the top San Juan mainstream música latina radio station: one hears advertising, positive commentary about Bad Bunny, but rarely his edgy music.

Of course, criollo is Puerto Rico’s core culture, the original font of its Western institutions, values, language, religion and, in music, música jíbara and the bolero. But from criollo roots didn’t burgeon the plena, the bomba, or other major categories of rhythms encompassed in Latin Music, including música urbana. Those African roots distinguish Puerto Rico from just being a clone of its Iberian heritage. No Boricua will deny this, and one can even argue that those roots were indeed expressed all over the show. For seconds, absorbed o appropriated, we heard Celia Cruz, El Gran Combo, and those roots also sprouted in the dances and the dancers. (That tourist promotion briefly shows a white dancer, presumably dancing the plena, dressed in santería white.)

In other words, missing from the half-time show was at least one explicit acknowledgment of the roots that hip-hop awakened from latency in Benito’s psyche to flower as trap, reggaeton, and his adopting the persona Bad Bunny. The podcasters, unaware of the internecine drama being played out, reasoned that Bad Bunny could have fine tuned consistent with his music by summoning Cardi B. to sing at the wedding scene. But the show was about a criollo foundational narrative, so Lady Gaga fit in as an Italian-heritaged Latina. Hope still springs that intellectual earwax will melt on both sides of the failure to communicate within the culture because, even though left out, every Newyorican cheered on Bad Bunny’s brilliant production, his speaking out for all Latinos.

For more on subjects or themes touched upon here see my “The Labyrinth of Multitude and Other Reality Checks on Being Latino/x” (Vernon Press), available at https://vernonpress.com/book/1914 or at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Labyrinth-Multitude…/dp/1648896774